Is the Puerto Rico Board Game Racist? (analysis)

Euro-Style / By

Is the Puerto Rico board game racist? It has has been a popular strategy game since its release in 2002, but recent discussions have raised concerns about its potential for promoting racist perspectives.

Set during the colonization of Puerto Rico, the game challenges players to strategically manage resources, including “colonists” who work on plantations and provide labor for the players.

Is Puerto Rico harmless fun? Or should its outdated view of the world be removed from mainstream board games?

puerto rico cover colonialism

Table of Contents

Introduction

Critics argue that colonists are essentially a representation of enslaved people, and the game’s mechanics encourage players to exploit them without considering the historical context and implications of their actions.

This issue highlights the broader problem of racism and colonialism present in various board games, as players may unknowingly perpetuate harmful stereotypes and trivialize historical atrocities.

The board game community and developers have become increasingly aware of the potential negative impacts of certain game themes and are now keen to create more inclusive and respectful gaming experiences.

Context and Controversy

The original Puerto Rico board game was released in 2002, and in the years since it has become a subject of debate and controversy due to its representation of colonialism and slavery. Set in the historical context of the island’s colonization, the game casts players as colonial governors vying for power and resources.

One aspect of the game that has attracted criticism is the use of “colonists” as a euphemism for slaves. Players collect and utilize these colonists to build their plantations and generate resources. This design choice has been seen as problematic and insensitive to the real historical struggles of enslaved people in Puerto Rico.

The game’s portrayal of colonialism has also been questioned, with some claiming it glorifies a dark and exploitative period in the island’s history. This criticism is part of a broader trend in the board gaming community, with increasing scrutiny of games that may perpetuate harmful stereotypes or misrepresent historical events and periods.

In response to the controversy, a revised edition titled “Puerto Rico 1897” has been developed with changes aimed at addressing the criticisms while preserving the gameplay mechanics. The revised version seeks to balance the game’s historical setting with an awareness of the social and ethical issues surrounding colonialism and slavery.

map of the west indies 1720

The Puerto Rico board game, like many others in the industry, needs to navigate the fine line between historical accuracy and sensitivity to modern-day perspectives and values. As a result, the ongoing discussion surrounding the game can serve as a valuable lesson on how to address and learn from such controversies in the future.

Puerto Rico Board Game Overview

Gameplay and Mechanics

Puerto Rico is a strategy board game where players take on the roles of colonial governors, aiming to achieve the highest prosperity by controlling plantations, building infrastructure, and managing the flow of goods. The game consists of various phases, including planting crops, producing goods, trading in the market, and shipping.

Players take turns to select roles, such as the settler, builder, mayor, craftsman, trader, or captain. Each role comes with its unique abilities and benefits. The choice of roles and efficient resource management are crucial for one’s success in the game.

The game progresses through several rounds until a predefined trigger condition is met, such as the depletion of victory point chips or the exhaustion of certain resources. The player with the most victory points at the end of the game is declared the winner.

Check out an in-depth guide to Puerto Rico.

Representation of Puerto Rico

The board game’s theme is centered around the colonization of Puerto Rico. As players aim to expand their plantations, they use “colonists,” which represents the island’s history of colonialism and forced labor. This aspect raises concerns of racial insensitivity, as pointed out by many online forums.

The game’s portrayal of Puerto Rico is also limited in its historical and cultural accuracy. Puerto Rico’s rich history, culture, and diversity are not adequately represented in the game, focusing instead on resource management and trade through a Eurocentric perspective.

While the game has been praised for its engaging gameplay and strategic elements, it is essential to be aware of and critically discuss the controversial aspects tied to its theme and representation.

Racism Claims and Criticisms

Depiction of Plantations and Colonists

In the board game Puerto Rico, players assume the role of colonial governors aiming to build their island economies. The game has been criticized for its use of “colonists” representing enslaved people, who were forced to work in plantations.

This depiction has been widely criticized for its insensitivity, particularly since the game seems to gloss over the historical reality of slavery. For instance, players can easily acquire and use “colonists” in their plantations without acknowledging their suffering or exploitation.

Racial Stereotypes and Insensitivity

Another concern is the potential for racial stereotypes in the game’s design and components, which portray plantation workers and buildings using simplified imagery. This has been seen as reinforcing negative and harmful generalizations about the people of Puerto Rico and their history.

Additionally, some players have expressed discomfort and offense at being asked to take on the roles of oppressors, participating in a system that caused immense suffering and had lasting consequences for millions of people. The game’s apparent lack of awareness of the darker aspects of its theme has led many to question its place in modern board gaming culture.

Defenses and Rebuttals

The Puerto Rico board game has been criticized for its allegedly racist themes, as it involves colonial governors amassing slaves, euphemistically referred to as “colonists”. Some critics argue that it’s time for the gaming community to take a stance on the themes allowed in board games.

Defenders of the Puerto Rico board game might argue that historical context is essential and that the game simply portrays an aspect of the past. By doing so, the game serves as an opportunity for players to learn about history and develop an understanding of colonialism’s consequences.

Another rebuttal could be that the game mechanics themselves are not inherently racist. Although the game includes controversial elements like the utilization of “colonists,” it is ultimately up to the individual players to determine how they approach the gameplay.

There have been efforts to “decolonize” the Puerto Rico board game and adapt it to modern sensibilities, as seen in discussions on Reddit. These attempts could be seen as ways of addressing such concerns without entirely dismissing the game.

In conclusion, the Puerto Rico board game has generated debate around the inclusion of controversial themes. While some argue against portraying and promoting colonialism, defenders might cite the importance of historical context and education opportunities as valid aspects of the game. Various opinions exist in the gaming community, and each person must decide for themselves how they would like to navigate these issues.

Board Game Industry and Diversity Issues

Similar Controversies

The board game industry has faced various controversies related to racism and colonialism, with games such as Puerto Rico and Scramble for Africa. In Puerto Rico, players assume the role of colonial governors and amass slaves, referred to as “colonists” in the game, which can be seen as perpetuating racism. Similarly, in Scramble for Africa, players take on the roles of European powers and exploit Africa for their benefit. Such games have sparked discussions around their portrayal of history and race.

Initiatives for Inclusivity and Representation

Several efforts are being undertaken to address the diversity issues in the board game industry. For instance, gaming companies are reevaluating and updating their existing games to avoid controversies and be more inclusive. In the case of the Puerto Rico board game, the new version has been developed to reduce racial insensitivity, following feedback from the gaming community.

Moreover, studies have been conducted to analyze the gender and racial representation in top-ranking board games, shedding light on these diversity issues. Such studies not only help gaming companies identify disparities but also guide them in making purposeful changes.

Furthermore, the gaming community has become more vocal about representation and inclusivity, demanding better portrayals of different cultures and histories. This heightened awareness has also contributed to a push for games that promote learning and empathy instead of perpetuating biases and harmful stereotypes.

Conclusion

The Puerto Rico board game has been a subject of discussion in various platforms, including on this Reddit thread and articles in publications like The Atlantic and The New York Times. Critics have raised concerns about the game’s depiction of colonization and the potential perpetuation of racism.

Is the Puerto Rico board game racist? The evolving definitions of racism mean that things considered acceptable decades ago are no longer seen in the same way. At best this makes Puerto Rico outdated.

It is essential to emphasize the importance of cultural sensitivity and contextual understanding when evaluating any form of media, including board games. Puerto Rico, as a game, enables players to explore the economic and social dynamics of colonialism within a historical context. While some players may find the game educational, others may feel uncomfortable with the subject matter.

In addressing these concerns, game designers can reevaluate their approach to historical themes, considering how they portray certain aspects and avoiding stereotyping or oversimplification. By doing so, board games can better reflect cultural diversity and historical events, encouraging a more inclusive gaming experience.

As consumers, it is crucial to make informed decisions when choosing games and to engage in discussions about problematic themes. By acknowledging different perspectives, the gaming community can better understand and appreciate the cultural implications and complexities behind such themes. Check out my review of the game play and mechanics of Puerto Rico.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Puerto Rico board game offensive?

The Puerto Rico board game has had mixed reactions, with some players finding it offensive due to its theme and others enjoying it for its strategic gameplay. However, some Puerto Ricans also cite their personal experience still led them to not find the game racist.

What is the controversy with the Puerto Rico game?

The primary controversy surrounding the Puerto Rico board game is its portrayal of colonialism and the exploitation of laborers. Some critics argue that the game oversimplifies and romanticizes the colonial period on the island of Puerto Rico.

How does the theme of the Puerto Rico board game relate to colonialism?

The Puerto Rico board game is set after the arrival of European colonizers on the island. Players assume the roles of colonial officials, developing the island and managing resources. The game involves the use of “colonist” tokens, which represent laborers, leading to criticisms that the game trivializes the harsh realities of colonialism and exploitation.

What are alternatives to the Puerto Rico board game?

For players looking for alternatives to the Puerto Rico board game, many options have different themes and mechanics. Some popular choices include Stratego, Scythe, or Wingspan. These games all offer complex strategies and engaging gameplay without touching on themes of colonialism or exploitation.

Are there similar board game controversies like Puerto Rico’s?

Yes, other board games have faced controversies related to their themes and representations. For example, board games like Catan and Mombasa have also been criticized for their portrayal of colonialism and exploitation. The gaming community is becoming increasingly aware of these issues and continues to discuss the impact of such themes on players.

How has the gaming community responded to Puerto Rico’s controversy?

The gaming community’s response to the Puerto Rico board game controversy has been varied, with some players and critics arguing that the game perpetuates harmful stereotypes and others defending its historical context. In recent years, the board game industry has started to address issues of representation and inclusivity, leading to a wider range of diverse themes and game mechanics being explored.

You may also like:

Scroll to Top